Peter Dutton’s controversial citizenship bill has failed to pass the Senate, leaving the package dead in its current form.
The Turnbull government will now be forced to make significant amendments to the bill before restarting negotiations, after the immigration minister failed to meet a Senate-imposed deadline on Wednesday to bring the bill on for debate.
Nick McKim, the Greens’ citizenship spokesman, hailed the bill’s failure as a major win.
“Today, the people of Australia have shown what we can achieve when we stand together,” McKim said on Wednesday. “People who are working, studying and raising families in Australia can now get on with their lives and make choices about their future, after they were so unfairly put on hold for months.”
Dutton told the Australian that the government remained committed to its citizenship package but he would not say when it intended to try to get an overhauled package through parliament.
After it became clear last month that Dutton’s bill could not get through parliament as it stood, a majority of senators voted to give him until Wednesday to bring his citizenship package on for debate in the Senate. The Greens, whose motion it was, said they were tired of Dutton telling voters how crucial his bill was while simultaneously withholding it from the Senate so it couldn’t be debated.
The bill did not make it to the Senate on Wednesday in time for debate, so was discharged from the notice paper.
Dutton conceded to his colleagues on Tuesday, in the Coalition party room, that he would now be willing to reduce the bill’s English language test from level six (university standard) to level five.
Guardian Australia also understands his office has raised the prospect with crossbenchers of amending the retrospective elements of his bill that have caused consternation.
Dutton’s office has approached key members of the NXT in the past few days to talk about possible amendments to his bill but it appears he has left it too late.
The component in the bill that gives Dutton the power to overrule decisions by the AAT does not appear to have figured in discussions with crossbenchers about possible amendments.
With the citizenship bill struck from the Senate notice paper, the government will have to move a motion to restore the bill to the notice paper, but the Senate will not support that. It means the Dutton will either have to dump his package completely or make substantial changes to get his bill through parliament again.
The bill, as it stood, would increase the waiting times for permanent residents before they could apply for citizenship (from one year to four years) and force new applicants to complete a tougher English-language test (and achieve a pass mark of 75%) equivalent to level six of the international English language testing system (IELTS).
It would also give Dutton the power to overrule decisions on citizenship applications by the AAT if he did not think the decisions were in the national interest, and give him power to decide whether or not the applicant had integrated into the Australian community.
“A number of the witnesses during the inquiry pretty much suggested the legislation was all about One Nation, about the Liberals cosying up to One Nation,” Griff said last month.
The Greens had not been contacted by Dutton’s office in the past week. They expected the bill to be struck from the Senate notice paper on Wednesday evening.
The Turnbull government will now be forced to make significant amendments to the bill before restarting negotiations, after the immigration minister failed to meet a Senate-imposed deadline on Wednesday to bring the bill on for debate.
Nick McKim, the Greens’ citizenship spokesman, hailed the bill’s failure as a major win.
“Today, the people of Australia have shown what we can achieve when we stand together,” McKim said on Wednesday. “People who are working, studying and raising families in Australia can now get on with their lives and make choices about their future, after they were so unfairly put on hold for months.”
Dutton told the Australian that the government remained committed to its citizenship package but he would not say when it intended to try to get an overhauled package through parliament.
After it became clear last month that Dutton’s bill could not get through parliament as it stood, a majority of senators voted to give him until Wednesday to bring his citizenship package on for debate in the Senate. The Greens, whose motion it was, said they were tired of Dutton telling voters how crucial his bill was while simultaneously withholding it from the Senate so it couldn’t be debated.
The bill did not make it to the Senate on Wednesday in time for debate, so was discharged from the notice paper.
Dutton conceded to his colleagues on Tuesday, in the Coalition party room, that he would now be willing to reduce the bill’s English language test from level six (university standard) to level five.
Guardian Australia also understands his office has raised the prospect with crossbenchers of amending the retrospective elements of his bill that have caused consternation.
Dutton’s office has approached key members of the NXT in the past few days to talk about possible amendments to his bill but it appears he has left it too late.
The component in the bill that gives Dutton the power to overrule decisions by the AAT does not appear to have figured in discussions with crossbenchers about possible amendments.
With the citizenship bill struck from the Senate notice paper, the government will have to move a motion to restore the bill to the notice paper, but the Senate will not support that. It means the Dutton will either have to dump his package completely or make substantial changes to get his bill through parliament again.
The bill, as it stood, would increase the waiting times for permanent residents before they could apply for citizenship (from one year to four years) and force new applicants to complete a tougher English-language test (and achieve a pass mark of 75%) equivalent to level six of the international English language testing system (IELTS).
It would also give Dutton the power to overrule decisions on citizenship applications by the AAT if he did not think the decisions were in the national interest, and give him power to decide whether or not the applicant had integrated into the Australian community.
“A number of the witnesses during the inquiry pretty much suggested the legislation was all about One Nation, about the Liberals cosying up to One Nation,” Griff said last month.
The Greens had not been contacted by Dutton’s office in the past week. They expected the bill to be struck from the Senate notice paper on Wednesday evening.
No comments:
Post a Comment