Thursday, June 11, 2009

ACTU: Fair work bill not fair for all

Secretary of the ACTU
Jeff Lawrence
11 June 2009

"The Prime Minister invited unions to work with his government in a historic partnership for the future on a social wage for the 21st century.

"Australian unions welcome the invitation and are committed to working with the government to achieve our shared aspirations for Australian working people.

"But the success of the partnership, as in the past, will be measured against the national interest and the results it delivers for working Australians.

"The partnership does not mean we will agree about everything or that there will not be sometimes serious differences in approach.

"For more than 100 years, the Australian union movement has fought for the rights of workers and for social policies that enhance the lives of working families, and having a Labor government in power does not change our focus or direction.

"The ACTU believes that at the 2007 election, Australians voted for their rights at work and for decency, fairness and equality at work. The Fair Work bill is a result of the Australian people having their say.

"The suggestion that the congress last week claimed there was a need for a further comprehensive rewrite of Australia's industrial laws is simply false. The only relevant party in the debate on industrial relations that has failed to rule out another wholesale rewrite of industrial relations laws is Malcolm Turnbull.

"The continued strong support for Work Choices within the Coalition poses a clear danger to the rights of working people and is the only possible source of uncertainty about Australia's IR framework.

"However, there is one area where the ACTU believes that the unfairness of John Howard's IR regime still exists and that is in the existence of the ABCC. We are totally opposed to laws that treat one set of workers differently from all others and believe that these laws are unfair and have no place in a modern, national industrial relations framework.

"The argument has been put that these laws are needed to stop inappropriate or unlawful behaviour. The union movement is absolutely opposed to any form of intimidation or bullying by any side in an industrial dispute. The isolated examples of inappropriate or unlawful behaviour, in the construction industry or elsewhere, should be and indeed are dealt with by the ordinary criminal law to which all Australians are subject.

"The most recent use of these laws is against an ordinary worker who attended a union meeting to discuss safety matters at the workplace and is now threatened with jail."

more

No comments: